Skip to main content
search

Date: Wednesday, May 13, 2026

Time: 10:00am -11:00am ET

Products: Simcyp®

Summary

As regulatory expectations evolve, model-informed drug development (MIDD) is no longer optional, it is increasingly central to decision-making, particularly in the context of streamlined development programs and single pivotal studies. Yet, while the use of PBPK, QSP, and other mechanistic models is growing, regulatory acceptance still hinges on one critical factor: credibility.

What makes a model “credible” in the eyes of regulators? Why do some models meaningfully inform decisions, while others raise concerns or are discounted entirely?

In this follow-up to Regulatory Horizons: Global Insights 2026, former regulators and clinical pharmacology experts will provide practical guidance on how to increase regulatory confidence in your models. The discussion will go beyond theory to focus on real-world decision-making: identifying common red flags, defining appropriate context of use, and demonstrating the totality of evidence needed to support model-informed claims.

The session will also explore how the evolving regulatory landscape, including increased reliance on single pivotal studies, is raising the bar for mechanistic and quantitative evidence, making well-positioned and well-communicated models more important than ever.

Attendees will leave with actionable strategies to move from simply including models in submissions to ensuring they are trusted, decision-enabling components of the regulatory package.

Register now


Key learning objectives:

By the end of this webinar, attendees will be able to:

  • Define model credibility from a regulatory perspective
    Understand how agencies assess plausibility, assumptions, validation, and fitness for purpose.
  • Identify common modeling red flags that undermine regulatory confidence
    Recognize pitfalls that can lead to questions, delays, or rejection of model-informed evidence.
  • Apply key principles of ICH M15 and context of use
    Ensure models are appropriately designed, justified, and aligned with their intended regulatory purpose.
  • Demonstrate the totality of evidence needed to support model-informed decisions
    Integrate clinical, nonclinical, and mechanistic data to strengthen submissions.
  • Translate models into regulatory decision-making tools
    Effectively link pharmacology, exposure, and clinical outcomes in a way that resonates with reviewers.
  • Implement strategies to increase regulatory acceptance and trust
    Use communication, transparency, and early engagement to improve the likelihood that models are relied upon, not just included.

Who should attend

This webinar is designed for professionals involved in clinical pharmacology, pharmacometrics, and model-informed drug development (MIDD) who are responsible for generating or defending model-based evidence in regulatory submissions.

Primary audience:

  • Clinical Pharmacologists
  • Pharmacometrics / PK-PD Scientists
  • PBPK and QSP Modelers
  • MIDD / Quantitative Sciences Leaders

Extended stakeholders:

  • Regulatory Affairs professionals supporting model-informed strategies
  • Translational Medicine and Early Development teams
  • Clinical Development scientists involved in dose selection and study design
  • CMC and cross-functional team members involved in bridging or integrated evidence packages

Speakers:

Eva Berglund, PhD

Senior Director, Clinical Pharmacology and Regulatory Strategy

Dr. Eva Gil Berglund is a pharmacist by training and has a PhD in Clinical Pharmacology, both from Uppsala University, Sweden. She has been a Clinical Pharmacology reviewer at the Swedish Medical Products Agency for over 20 years and a Senior Expert for 12 years, working with all types of molecules in marketing applications, clinical trials and scientific advice procedures in the EMA Network of National agencies. Eva has been working in all therapeutic areas and has extensive knowledge in antivirals, antibiotics, CNS active drugs, oncology, rheumatology, inhalation products etc.

Blaire Osborn, PhD

Senior Director, Clinical Pharmacology and Translational Medicine

Dr. Osborn has over 25 years of drug development experience in the areas of clinical pharmacology and pharmacokinetics. She has focused primarily oncology and anti-infectives. Before joining Certara, she was a reviewer in the Office of Clinical Pharmacology, US Food and Drug Administration, in the Division of Cancer Pharmacology, CDER where, she participated in the assessment of multiple dose justification submissions under Project Optimus. Prior to working in the FDA, she was a clinical pharmacologist in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at the National Institute of Health (NIH).

Justin Hay, PhD

Senior Director, Clinical Pharmacology Consulting

Dr. Hay joined Certara in 2022 with 25+ years of clinical pharmacology experience having started his career as Senior Clinical Scientist at the Centre for Human Drug Research (CHDR), Leiden. More recently he worked as Senior Pharmacokinetics Assessor and Deputy Unit Manager at the Medicine and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), UK where he also had a leading role with the Access Consortium (Regulatory agencies of Australia, Canada, Singapore, Switzerland and UK).

Justin has also been a member of the EMA’s former Modelling and Simulation Working Party (MSWP). He has a special interest in biologics, CNS research, pain management and pediatric pharmacology. Justin has a PhD from the University of Adelaide, Australia.

Lisa Almond, PhD

Register now