Skip to main content
search

Conference: Phuse US Connect

Date: March 16-19, 2025

Location: Orlando, Florida

Booth: A

Sponsor: Platinum

Where to hear Certara insights and Expertise

Monday, March 17, 4:30-5pm ET
Considerations for the Submission of RWD using CDISC, With Insights from HL7 FHIR and OMOP

Presenters: Jeffrey Abolafia, Director of Product Innovation

There is a rapid increase in the use of RWD to support marketing applications. However, submitting RWD may pose numerous challenges for regulatory reviewers in their analysis of the data. In our four previous papers, we outline these challenges and present several high-level solutions. This current paper builds on our previous work by taking a deep dive into an example CDISC SDTM submission and highlighting updates needed to the SDTM to better accommodate RWD. Specifically, we examine a subset of key domains such as Exposure, Adverse Events, Demography, and Labs. Considering how other models such as HL7 FHIR and OMOP handle certain elements, we propose new and updated data elements, core designations and business/validation rules that are needed to support RWD. These ideas are intended to help sponsors submit RWD and to start the conversation with SDOs such as CDISC around the updates needed for more efficient regulatory review.

Tuesday, March 18 – 9:30am-10:00am ET
Accelerating PKPD Analysis with Automated DDI Variable Creation: A SAS-Based Approach

Authors: Harish Ganesan and Sunil Mummidisetty

Presenters: Harish Ganesan, MSc, Scientist

Creating time-varying drug-drug interaction (DDI) variables is essential but often time-consuming in PKPD dataset construction. Our SAS-based standardized script automates this process, leveraging a continuously updated internal database of drug lists and potencies, curated by our DIDB clinical experts. This has led to substantial efficiency and quality gains.

Many challenges are being handled in the script, for example, names of drugs in CM or ADCM are not consistently reported (for e.g., combination of drugs can be represented using “;” or “and” or “+”), creating a challenge while searching for appropriate DDI. Each drug has a different potency, and the potency can be different when given together with other drugs. Provisions in the script are also made to dynamically change the window of induction/inhibition to consider the half-life and lag effect of a drug. We will further detail these and other challenges when presented.

Tuesday, March 18 – 4:00pm-4:30pm ET
Strategic Authoring of Clinical Study Reports to Leverage AI for Data Privacy and Public Disclosure

Presenter: Anaya Rehman, MBBS, MSc, Senior Transparency Specialist

Creating time-varying drug-drug interaction (DDI) variables is essential but often time-consuming in PKPD dataset construction. Our SAS-based standardized script automates this process, leveraging a continuously updated internal database of drug lists and potencies, curated by our DIDB clinical experts. This has led to substantial efficiency and quality gains.

Many challenges are being handled in the script, for example, names of drugs in CM or ADCM are not consistently reported (for e.g., combination of drugs can be represented using “;” or “and” or “+”), creating a challenge while searching for appropriate DDI. Each drug has a different potency, and the potency can be different when given together with other drugs. Provisions in the script are also made to dynamically change the window of induction/inhibition to consider the half-life and lag effect of a drug. We will further detail these and other challenges when presented.

Tuesday, March 18, 4:30-5pm ET
The Show Must Go On: Best Practices for Submitting SDTM Data for Ongoing Studies

Presenter: Kristin Kelly, Senior Principal CDISC Consultant

Though the CDISC SDTM Implementation Guide provides advice on how to prepare SDTM datasets for completed studies, there is little guidance on what to do when the study is ongoing, leading to varied implementation practices across the industry. At times, it may be difficult for a regulatory reviewer to readily determine that a study is still in progress without looking in the Clinical Study Data Reviewer’s Guide (cSDRG). The recent addition of the ONGOSIND (Ongoing Study Indicator) parameter in the FDA Study Data Technical Conformance Guide (sdTCG) allows sponsors to clearly specify within the data whether a study is ongoing. In this paper, some considerations for preparing domains such as Demographics (DM), Disposition (DS), and Trial Summary (TS) for an ongoing study as well as strategies to ensure data transparency across the SDTM submission package will be discussed.

Tuesday, March 18, 5:30-7pm ET
Poster: Elevate Your Game: Leveling Up SDTM Validation with the Magic of Data Managers

Julie Ann Hood, Principal CDISC Consultant, and Jennifer Manzi, Senior CDISC Consultant

Selecting players armed with unique abilities to collaborate is key to crafting an unbeatable strategy, whether on the field, navigating a quest, or in the office. In standardized clinical trial data, this can break down departmental silos and enhance study data quality, leading to more effective treatments sooner. Historically, SDTM programmers handled validation report issues, but some rules require tracing SDTM data back to raw data or data collection to optimize decision-making. Integrating data managers can slash resolution time and boost data quality. This poster will provide guidance on weaving data managers into the SDTM validation process and unveil different workflows to level up your approach to resolving validation issues. Curating appropriate FDA validation rules will showcase how these are best served by the unique positioning of data managers. Lastly, suggested training and ideas to power-up your data managers will equip you to battle issues and conquer those data demons.

Tuesday, March 18, 5:30-7pm ET
Poster: Disclosure without Exposure: Optimizing technology for clinical data protection

Honz Slipka, MSc, Sr. Transparency Specialist, Clinical Disclosure

Most new drugs coming to market are required to publicly disclose the clinical trials leading up to their marketing authorization. As a result of this public disclosure, clinical trials must be anonymized to protect both personal and commercially sensitive data. While this is a small part of the end-to end process of getting drugs to patients, clinical data protection is a critically important, labor-intensive, and often bottle-necking process. Pharmaceutical companies are turning towards AI-leveraging software that enables automated identification of protected personal data (PPD) or commercially confidential information (CCI). The evolution in the way data is identified and anonymized has forced positive shifts towards lean authoring, terminology harmonization, and establishing sensitive data libraries. This presentation will cover small changes that can be implemented to clinical research, and how they cascade into large, impactful outcomes that optimize efficient clinical data protection using emerging AI tools.​

Read the paper

Meet us there

Our experts can’t wait to speak to you in Orlando. Help us come prepared. Submit the short form below so we can coordinate a best time and date with you.