Publication: Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Abstract
Milvexian is an investigational anticoagulant being developed to prevent harmful blood clots with potentially reduced bleeding risk compared to current therapies. To identify the most appropriate dose for a phase III clinical trial in atrial fibrillation, researchers applied multiple quantitative approaches. Population pharmacokinetic and exposure–response models were developed using phase I and phase II clinical data to evaluate how milvexian levels in the body relate to clot prevention, bleeding risk, and biomarker changes.
In parallel, a model-based meta-analysis compared milvexian’s expected performance with approved anticoagulants using published trial data. Together, these analyses supported selecting a 100 mg twice-daily dose for further evaluation, balancing efficacy with a favorable bleeding profile.
This study demonstrates how model-informed approaches can improve dose selection decisions when direct clinical comparisons or validated biomarkers are limited.
Author(s): Wangda Zhou, Emily Bozenhardt, Gregory E. Alexander, Matthew L. Zierhut, Samira Merali, Antoinette Ajavon-Hartmann, Peter Zannikos, Hyunmoon Back, EunYoung Suh, Navin Goyal, Mahesh N. Samtani, Alexei N. Plotnikov, Chandni Valiathan
Year: August 22, 2025
Facing uncertainty in dose selection, trial design, or comparative effectiveness?
Model-Based Meta-Analysis (MBMA) brings together evidence across studies to reveal clearer trends, reduce risk, and guide smarter decisions.


